Clot-Buster Doesn’t Raise Bleeding Risk in Warfarin Patients: Study
May 14, 2012 by JG
Write comment
dentapress Premium
Use the dentapress- partnerservice to encourage your comany- profile within the target group.-
dentapress SERVICES |
dentapress SERVICES
Use the dentapress- network to publish your own topic! Publish easy and fast. Place your post on dentapress! You also profit through the distribution at Facebook, Twitter and all other media- channels. -
FACEBOOK |
Share on Facebook
Exchange news and articles with your friends. Become a Fan and use our application. -
TWITTER |
Tweet & Track
Keep updated through Twitter: Follow dentapress via the instant message platform. Get our updates immediately. - WIDGETS & GADGETS |
- FEEDS |
- MOBILE |
-
GERMANY
GERMANY
Visit dentapress GERMANY.
Posted at May 6, 2011 by JG
Evaluation of the accuracy of different transfer impression techniques for multiple implants » scielo.br
Share on Facebook | Share on zahnigroups | Share on ALUMNIGROUPSThe aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of three implant transfer impression techniques. Four groups (n = 5) were defined, according to the technique: TC – tapered copings without splint; SC – square copings without splint; SCS – square copings splinted with dental floss and acrylic resin, and CG (control group) – master model with four external hexagonal implants and a superstructure. Individual trays and polyether were used for the impression. All casts were checked for their fit into the master superstructure; for this, all four screws were placed in the implants. Digital photos were taken and images were analyzed using UTHSCSA ImageTool software. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way analysis of variance and Studentâs t test (p < 0.05).
Read more:
http://www.scielo.br/scielo...0200011&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
WRITE COMMENT